Note: As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

My use of the INLAND 512GB Gen4x4 M.2 Internal SSD PCIe 4.0 (2024)

My use of the INLAND 512GB Gen4x4 M.2 SSD: performance, durability, device compatibility and value.
Daniel Anderson



November 25, 2023


Recently I upgraded my computer with the INLAND 512GB SSD. I use it mainly for gaming and general productivity tasks (data crunching). Below is my experience with it considering how crowded the market for storage solutions is.


Property Value Property Value
Digital Storage Capacity 512 GB Hard Disk Interface NVMe
Connectivity Technology SATA Brand INLAND
Special Feature Portable, Backward Compatible Hard Disk Form Factor 2230 Inches
Hard Disk Description Solid State Hard Drive Compatible Devices Laptop, Gaming Console, Desktop, Tablet
Installation Type Internal Hard Drive Hard Disk Size 512 GB


Performance and Benchmarks of the INLAND 512GB SSD

A bar graph showing the sequential read/write speeds of different ssds including the inland 512gb

When it comes to sheer speed and responsiveness, the INLAND 512GB SSD feels like a major leap from traditional hard drives and even some entry-level SSDs. My experience shapes up around several key attributes:

  • Speed: The sequential read/write speeds of up to 4,900/3,700 MB/s are not just numbers; applications load almost instantaneously, and system startups are swift. It’s a noticeable improvement that saves time and frustration, particularly when transferring large files.

  • Heat Management: Without a DRAM cache, which is common in higher-end SSDs, this drive relies heavily on the host memory buffer. Surprisingly, it doesn’t seem to have affected the drive’s performance during my use. The power efficiency is remarkable, even under load, the unit stays relatively cool, which is impressive given that it doesn’t pack unnecessary bulk with DRAM.

  • Performance Consistency: While an impressive sprinter when it comes to handling large files or booting up demanding applications, there’s a catch. The DRAM-less nature of this SSD means it might not always keep up with prolonged, intense workloads as well as its DRAM-equipped counterparts. However, for average gaming, casual creative work, and general productivity, it’s been reliably fast.

Here are my takeaways, broken down into a bit more detail:


  • Fast and responsive for everyday tasks and gaming.

  • Good heat management, doesn’t require additional cooling.

  • Competitive price point in the NVMe market.


  • Lack of DRAM might affect performance in prolonged high-intensity tasks.

  • Not the best choice for tasks that require sustained high-speed read/write operations.

Honestly, while I’ve seen the debate about DRAM-less SSDs, I haven’t missed it for my personal use. For gaming, this SSD has given my system a refreshing boost, with shorter load times making transitions almost seamless. Even in my creative projects, such as video editing, the benefits of this NVMe tech are quite evident, though I’m curious about its performance longevity, which hasn’t yet been an issue for me.

The compatibility with various small-form devices like the Steam Deck and numerous ultrabooks is a welcome feature, suggesting thoughtful design targeting modern portability needs. Although my personal application has been mostly restricted to my desktop, the drive’s versatility is an added advantage I appreciate.

On the downside, I can’t help but mention the absence of a more substantial warranty, something that competitors offer. It’s a minor gripe but something that might be critical for users seeking long-term assurance.

In terms of actual use, my files fly across the screen faster than on my previous Samsung 950 Pro, and the overall system responsiveness feels sprightly—almost like injecting new life into my existing setup. If you’re considering this SSD, bear in mind the balance between price and performance, and if your use case aligns with the strengths of this drive, it’s a move you’re likely to appreciate.

Durability and Longevity Insights

A digital counter showing a high number to symbolize the tbw (terabytes written) of the inland ssd

When it comes to the durability and longevity of SSDs, they are often discussed less than their speed and performance, but they are just as crucial for a satisfactory user experience. I’ve had my share of concerns about how long an SSD can last, especially when it gets to the consumer-grade products like the INLAND 512GB Gen4x4 M.2 Internal SSD. Here is what I’ve observed:

  • Impressive Endurance Rating: The 300 TBW rating stands out as a promise of reliability. Although this can’t be tested in the short term, it does give me confidence that the drive will handle my demanding tasks without wearing out prematurely.

  • Heat Management: Overheating is a notorious SSD killer. This SSD’s heat management is vital, as it can affect both performance and lifespan. While the idle temperatures remain low, I did notice a slight increase during heavy loads. It’s nothing alarming, but something to keep an eye on.

  • Operational Lifespan: The MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) of 1.5 million hours is another reassuring figure. Although it is an estimate and not a guarantee, it’s indicative of a durable device.

Let’s look at these considerations point by point:

SSD Durability Considerations:

  • Terabytes Written (TBW): A good gauge of lifespan, and 300 TBW is respectable for this class.

  • MTBF: High values here suggest fewer chances of failure, and 1.5 million hours is commendable.

  • Heat Dissipation: Even without active cooling, temperatures are staying within safe limits.

  • Warranty Period: At 6 years, it’s a solid commitment from the manufacturer and adds to peace of mind.

While the brand may not be as well-known as some competitors, I don’t believe that popularity always equals quality. In fact, sometimes lesser-known brands can offer the same or better value. On the other hand, there are potential drawbacks such as the possibility of suboptimal customer service support, unclear firmware update procedures, and a lack of accompanying software for monitoring the SSD’s health.

As for my personal take, I’ve used this SSD in my setup for several months now, and I can say it has performed reliably without showing any signs of slowing down. Naturally, the real test of time will be in the years to come, but initial indicators suggest a sturdy build. I’m particularly pleased with the six-year warranty, which gives me some assurance that the company stands behind their product’s robustness.

Of course, only time will truly tell, but so far, it looks promising that this SSD will be a long-term resident in my rig. I’ll make sure to update this review if anything changes on the durability front, but for now, I’m optimistic about the lifespan of this little powerhouse.

Compatibility and Installation Experience with Various Devices

An illustration showing the ssd being inserted into different devices such as a laptop and a gaming console

When it comes to the compatibility and installation experience of the INLAND 512GB Gen4x4 M.2 SSD, I’ve had a pretty varied journey across different gadgets and setups. Here’s a quick rundown of my observations:

  • Steam Deck: This SSD was a lifesaver. The installation was seamless, and it gave my device a whole new lease on life with ample storage.

  • Surface Pro X: To expand the rather limited 128 GB storage, the SSD fit perfectly and boosted performance significantly.

  • Lenovo GO and ThinkPad E14 Gen 4: Cloning the old drive to this new one worked without a hitch, and the SSD slid into the 2242-sized drive space like it was meant to be there.

But, of course, not all installations were a walk in the park:

  • Alienware 15 R2: This required a bit of BIOS trickery and removing the internal SATA drive during installation, but once set up, it was a game changer.

  • Asus Z97 Motherboard: Here’s where things got tricky. The PCIe 5 connector design was problematic, making me choose between optimal SSD performance and my GPU’s cooling needs.

I appreciated the straightforward bare drive approach of this SSD—no stickers or covers to fuss with when attaching an aftermarket heatsink. Plus, the low power consumption makes it a great fit for devices where battery life is paramount. I’d definitely mention that while this M.2 SSD fit perfectly into small devices like the Steam Deck and ultrabooks, there was potential for complications in larger desktop setups, particularly those with constrained PCIe layouts.

From my experience, here are the key takeaways:

  • Ease of installation: Generally simple, with some devices being plug-and-play, but watch out for BIOS settings, especially if you’re using it as a boot drive.

  • Heat management: While operable temperatures are within a safe range, an extra heatsink can be key for peace of mind, especially in tightly packed builds.

  • Form factor versatility: The 2230 size is incredibly versatile, but be sure to check your device’s specifications before skating on the assumption that size fits all.

In essence, while the INLAND 512GB SSD may not have the big brand name recognition, it punches above its weight in its class and offers a potent mix of versatility and performance. That said, potential buyers should be aware of the installation quirks and ensure their systems are compatible to avoid any unpleasant surprises.

Value for Money Analysis of the INLAND 512GB SSD

A balance scale with one side showing a stack of coins and the other side the inland ssd to denote value comparison

When assessing the value for money of the INLAND 512GB SSD, I’m looking at several factors including performance, endurance, power consumption, and compatibility. Here’s what I’ve gathered:

  • Performance: Right out of the gate, the sequential read/write speeds and IOPS are impressive for this price point. My system boot time dropped dramatically, and applications run smoother.

  • Endurance: With 300 TBW and a 1,500,000-hour MTBF, longevity seems promising. It’s too early to call it, but these numbers bring some peace of mind.

  • Power Consumption: It’s energy-efficient, staying cool and quiet, which matters when you’re trying to keep a low-power setup.

  • Compatibility: The fact that it’s designed for a variety of devices adds to its appeal – my Steam Deck and ultrabook now have plenty of room to breathe.

However, it’s not sunshine and rainbows all the way. For starters, the brand isn’t as well recognized as some competitors. Plus, the warranty of only 3 years is slightly less than what others offer. It doesn’t come with its own monitoring software either, which would’ve been a nice touch. But these drawbacks are relatively minor.

Installing this SSD was a straightforward process, and there’s something satisfying knowing you’ve got such a speed boost without spending a hefty sum. This is a substantial upgrade, especially for older devices that need a bit more zip.

As a conclusion to my overall experience, here’s a quick rundown in my pros and cons list:


  • High sequential read/write speeds and IOPS offer noticeable performance improvement

  • Solid endurance ratings with a fair MTBF

  • It’s an affordable option for storage expansion

  • Low power draw helps maintain cooler system temperatures

  • Designed to fit in a range of devices, enhancing its versatility


  • Shorter warranty compared to some competitors

  • Lacks a strong brand recognition

  • No included software for drive management or firmware updates

In the grand scheme of things, the INLAND 512GB SSD is a solid performer. If you’re looking for an SSD that hits many of the right notes but won’t leave your wallet feeling too light, this could very well be it. Sure, it may not have the brand recognition or the software suite that comes with the big names, but what it does offer is a balance between cost and performance that’s hard to ignore. It’s practical, it’s speedy, and it just works – and sometimes, that’s all you really need.